<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="paper.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>

<paper xmlns="http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/daniele/XML">

  <filename>GapCVPP</filename>

  <title>The inapproximability of lattice and coding problems with
  preprocessing</title>

  <author>Uriel Feige</author>
  <author>Daniele Micciancio</author>
    
  <reference>
    <link>http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/0022-0000</link>
    <journal>Journal of Computer and System Sciences</journal>
    <volume>69</volume>
    <number>1</number>
    <pages>45-60</pages>
    <year>2004</year>
    <note>Invited paper</note>
    <note>Preliminary version in CCC 2002</note>
    <doi>10.1016/j.jcss.2004.01.002</doi>
  </reference>

  <abstract> 
    <p xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> We prove that the closest
    vector problem with preprocessing (CVPP) is NP-hard to approximate
    within any factor less than <em>sqrt{5/3}</em>.  More
    specifically, we show that there exists a reduction from an
    NP-hard problem to the approximate closest vector problem such
    that the lattice depends only on the size of the original problem,
    and the specific instance is encoded solely in the target
    vector. It follows that there are lattices for which the closest
    vector problem cannot be approximated within factors <em>gamma
    &lt; sqrt{5/3}</em> in polynomial time, no matter how the lattice
    is represented, unless NP is equal to P (or NP is contained in
    P/poly, in case of nonuniform sequences of lattices). The result
    easily extends to any <em>L<sub>p</sub></em> norm, for <em>p &gt;=
    1</em>, showing that CVPP in the <em>L<sub>p</sub></em> norm is
    hard to approximate within any factor <em>gamma &lt;
    {5/3}<sup>{1/p}</sup></em>. As an intermediate step, we establish
    analogous results for the nearest codeword problem with
    preprocessing (NCPP), proving that for any finite field GF(q),
    NCPP over GF(q) is NP-hard to approximate within any factor less
    than 5/3.</p>
  </abstract>

  <note>Preliminary version in 
  <link doi="10.1109/CCC.2002.1004338">CCC 2002</link>
  </note>
</paper>
